A Comparison Between Dulce Et Decorum Est and Pro Patria Essay

The foremost serviceman War was the first real modern contend. Its atrocities and huge terminal buzzer changed pecks views of state of state of war drastic completelyy. pro patria, by Owen Seaman and Dulce et decorousness est by Wilfred Owen are both war rimes write around the beat of the First World War, and as such(prenominal) share authentic sur impertinence properties. However, the two poems differ enormously in their implicit meaning and intentions, swelled the two poems many subtle differences surrounded by their texts. both(prenominal) poems use fiction. Seaman uses metaphor when work forcetioning the brute sword and sol cloyrs u snake pitg noted scutcheons, a blaringly inaccurate image to organise up the idea of chivalry and knights in shining armor, giving that the fighting would be fair and glorious, as hostile to the stilt slaughter and unimaginable tortures spelled pop in Owens Dulce et Decorum est. seaman as well as makes use of anthropomorphisat ion, making England out as some capital, good but enigmatical creature. He refers to England as a macrocosm of some sort, writing of its pleas for intermission at the nations bar, stating that England unavoidablenessed to go to war to adjudge its honor. Owen uses metaphor to destine the state of the soldiers in his poem, saying that the men were drunk with fatigue. The use of fiction is more found only in his poem, when he talks about soldiers flex fork-like, same(p) beggars under sacks and coughing like hags. The use of simile as hostile to metaphor adds to the realness of the poem. twain war poems have religious undertones. The use of Latin in both texts aids this, mimicking the Latin masses of the Catholic Church. Seaman says that those leave at home whilst their sons go to war must be strong in conviction and in prayer and that they should conduct what run intoering we may consecrate, suggesting to the passel back home to turn to their faith for comfort, and to be willing to give up the luxuries of a quiet life for the greater good. Dolce et Decorum est, on the arctic hand, uses the idea of the devils face to describe the expression of a gas pedal victimHis hanging face, like a Devils sick of sinThe comparison also describes the world fatigue of the soldier, what atrocities must a devil be to be sick of sin?Both poems are trying to affect the ordinarys views on the war. master Patria is fundamentally a propaganda poem, an invention used to great effect during the Boer war and revived at the advent of the First World War. The poems previous(predicate) references to honor and duty are to harry young men into singing up for the army, fabricating images of glorious victory in their minds, and guardedly avoiding the nitty gritty mechanics of it, the living in squalid trenches and the likelihood of death.The later sections of the poem are addressed to the parents of the warrior sons urging them to keep a stiff upper lip, or as he puts i t to hush all vulgar clamor of the street. The priming coat for this is that if every time a sustain received a letter from the M.O.D heavy her that her son was dead she were to rush out into the street screaming OH MY GOD, MY POOR kick up HES GONE opposite mothers and fathers would have reservations about sending their sons off to war. Therefore the silence of bereaved parents of fusspot sons went some way to helping the recruiting sergeants job.Dulce et Decorum est is the perfect opposite of the propaganda that is Pro Patria. Whiles Pro Patria uses misleading metaphors Dulce et Decorum est attempts to create the realities of war. Where Pro Patria attempts to glorify war and depict it as honorable, Dulce et Decorum est shows the malicious gossip grime and suffering that went on at the front line. The impassiveness of the soldiers to the gruesome death of the gas victims as they fling him in the cart (the use of the word flung punctuate the fact that this was not unusual and that it had happened before), the commentary of the soldiers as beggars shows a stark argument to Seamans proud and nobleman warrior sons.In structure the poems are sooner homogeneous, Dulce et Decorum est seeming to be around a parody of the older Pro Patria. Indeed when read line by line alternately from different poems, the poems seem to compliment each otherEngland in this great fight to which you go,Bent double like old beggars under sacksAlso, the concluding stanzas of both poems use very similar rhyme patterns. Pro Patrias penultima lines rhyme best with test, and Dulce et Decorum est rhymes savor with est in the same lines (in relation to the end).Both poems encapsulate their message in the concluding lines, the finishing pleas of Seamen for parents to send their sons to war, and the solemn Latin verse of Dulce et Decorum est warning people not to indulge in ultranationalismMy friend you would not tell with such high zest,To children,the old lie Dulce et decorum e stPro patria mori(How sweet and fitting it is to die for your country)Both poems are from around the time of the First World War, Pro Patria was create verbally just before the outbreak, written during the conflict.I believe that the stance taken by the authors stems from their experience of the war and the time at which they were written. Seaman did not and could not have it away what was to happen in the Great War, as it was yet to happen when he wrote the poem. Owen, on the other hand, had been at the front line, and had seen what he was writing about, and felt a need to tell others what he had seen, as opposed to Seaman who was writing for the government.