Nike – good or bad?

Nike is goodA pulverisation called Samyang in Vietnam (a factory under Nike contract) seems to be keeping sufficient working levels within the building. It employs 5,200 people, most of them being women. The factory is made up of six big buildings with well-kept surroundings. Inside, there are fans keeping the workers cool, produce extinguishers about in the case of an emergency, and workers muckle easily access goggles, masks and gloves if they read them.Workers get double the local average of $54 per month and an yearbook bonus of at least one months salary. Other factories get a lot less in rural areas, factories pay $35 per month, in suburbs they pay $40 per month, and in cities, $45 per month. In state- have factories (factories owned by the government), workers get a surprisingly low $15 per month altogether this bullion they are getting has allowed most of them (three quarters) to buy a television, many a(prenominal) to have a motorbike, some to have phones, etc. Not only when does this improve their support, but it excessively allows other businesses such as petrol stations, electronic repair shops, etc. to function properly and make money too. This is called the multiplier effect.Nike has made changes to improve health and safety. In 1998, it replaced the very tempestuous petroleum-based solvents with less harmful water-based ones. In 1999, an expert in the field went to curse Nike had actually done this at the Tae Kwang Vina factory in Vietnam. The investigator put that Nike had indeed replaced the compound and had also installed local exhaust ventilation systems. They also discovered that Nike had trained certain staff personnel aspects of health and safety.Nike is hazardousNike does not own the factories their clothes are manufactured in. This means they can leave at any time, leaving thousands of workers unemployed and fighting for their life while they find another job. For example, on February 22nd 2008, the BJ&J factory in the Dominic Republic announced that it was going to slowly fire workers and close. The factory, owned by Korean company called Yupoong, was making Nike caps at the time.In the Tae Kwang Vina factory mentioned earlier, some health and safety issues remained. several(prenominal) sections of the factory were still capable to hazardous chemicals, and to high heat and noise levels. In 1997, it was found that workers in a different factory were being exposed to 100 times the legal limit of Toluene, a toxic gas.Nike gets its clothes made in countries with free trade zones where it is illegal or extremely difficult for workers to devise into trade unions. It is practically impossible for workers to get separate conditions (such as better pay, improved health and safety, etc.) when they cannot get together and form a unite group to approach their boss.However, this said, some factory workers have done it in advance and achieved what they were protesting for. The Ching Luh Nike factory has 21,000 employees, and in June 2008, after going on strike for 2 days, they managed to get Nike to increase their wages by $6 a month.Some people think that the minimum wage in countries is enough to endure because the cost of living in that particular country is lower too. The map below proves this to be wrong with three primary countries that Nike manufactures in.Nike doesnt pay slews to its workers. In many countries, they live way under the predicted living wage. The put off shows the average wage of all the factories in that country, and the living wage in each. The data presented is only an average. Some factory workers earn only $1.60 a day, where the price of three meals a day is $2.00.