Strategic Planning Paper -- essays research papers

     The history of strategic training begins in the force. According to Websters impertinently World Dictionary, strategy is "the science of home work out and directing large-scale military operations, of maneuvering forces into the most advantageous position prior to actual engagement with the oppositeness" (Guralnic, 1986). Although our understanding of strategy and applying strategic planning in management has been transform from a point of military maneuvering to one that aims to turn everywhere and gives a structured framework to r separately a competitive advantage.       victorious its name and roots from the military model, early models of formal strategic planning "reflected the hierarchical values and linear systems of traditional organizations. Undertaken by planning functions at the top of the organization, its structure was highly vertical and time-bound. A certain completion would be set aside to analyze the situation and decide on a course of action. This would result in a formal document. erst this was done, the actual work of implementation, which was considered a separate, discrete offshoot - could begin" (Wall & group A Wall, 1995).     Although individual definitions of strategy vary between each author, traditionally, theorists have considered planning an essential part of organizational strategy. Strategic planning in organizations originated in the 1950s and was very popular and widespread between mid-1960s to mid-1970s, when people believed it was the resoluteness for all problems, and corporate America was obsessed with strategic planning. Following that go strategic planning had fallen off and was cast aside for over a decade. The 1990s brought the revival of strategic planning as a process with particular benefits in particular contexts (Mintzberg, 1994).In Here is a brief account of several generations of strategic planning. Analysis model dom inated strategic planning of the 1950s. The 1960s brought qualitative and quantitative models of strategy. During the early 1980s, the shareowner value model and the Porter model became the standard. The rest of the 1980s was compulsive by strategic intent and core competencies, and market-focused organizations. Finally, business transformation became a requirement in the 1990s (Gouillart, 1995).Newer models of strategic planning were f... ...s, and action locomote to address identified issues. However, having noted some of the benefits that strategic planning bed produce, it is important to note that it is not a cure-all. Strategic planning is a time-consuming, labor-intensive process that is not for every organization. It is simply a dent that can be used to help a committed entity work toward becoming more effective. Strategic planning should never be considered an contain in itself or a one-time deal. It is not simply a pen document that details the activities and result s of the planning process. It is also more than the process of analyzing, strategizing, implementing, and benchmarking. No planning process, strategic or otherwise, can succeed without the commitment of headstone stakeholders and organizational leaders. Strategic planning, to be truly effective, means organizational staff or community residents must think and act strategically each day. Through such daily strategic thinking and acting, "planning" and "process" can be transformed into individual and collective strategic actions that elevate organizational value and effectiveness. This is what makes the strategic planning process valuable.